Wednesday, October 22, 2014
One of NYPD's finest arrests a man for playing in the subway after he
recites the law word for word that allows him to perform for donations.
He continues to sing as he is being handcuffed. A "fuck the police"
chant subsequently follows.
Tuesday, October 14, 2014
*************CONFIDENTIAL************* Produced by the VA Blue Button (v12.8) 31 Aug 2014 @ 1926 This summary is a copy of information from your My HealtheVet Personal Health Record. Your summary may include: - information that you entered (self reported) - information from your VA health record - your military service information from the department of defense (DoD). ***Note: Your health care team may not have all of the information from your Personal Health Record unless you share it with them. Contact your health care team if you have questions about your health information.*** Key: Double dashes (--) mean there is no information to display. Name: HARASYM, WILLIAM DANIEL Date of Birth: 18 Oct 1955
Date Range Selected: 15 Jul 2003 to 31 Aug 2014
Data Types Selected: My HealtheVet Account Summary
VA Radiology Reports
MY HEALTHEVET ACCOUNT SUMMARY
Source: VA Authentication Status: Authenticated Authentication Date: 25 Apr 2011 Authentication Facility ID: 666 Authentication Facility Name: SHERIDAN VAMC
Procedure/Test Name: KNEE 2 VIEWS Date/Time Exam Performed: 12 Feb 2009 @ 1332 Ordering Location: SHERIDAN VAMC Requesting Provider: GRAVES,CHARLES B Reasons for Study: To be done in conjunction w/MRI per DVA Clinical History: left knee pain consistent with meniscal tear Performing Location: SHERIDAN VAMC 1898 FORT ROAD, SHERIDAN 82801 Radiologist: DONAHUE,FRANCIS I -------------------------------------------------------------------------- RADIOLOGY REPORT Report: Severe medial, moderate patellofemoral and lateral joint compartment narrowing with marginal and central osteophytes and genu varus. No joint effusion. Patellar alignment cannot be ascertained on axial images. Impression: Tricompartmental osteoarthritis as described above ========================================================================= Procedure/Test Name: KNEE LEFT W/O (MRI) Date/Time Exam Performed: 12 Feb 2009 @ 1331 Ordering Location: SHERIDAN VAMC Requesting Provider: GRAVES,CHARLES B Reasons for Study: left knee pain consistent with meniscal tear Clinical History: Performing Location: SHERIDAN VAMC 1898 FORT ROAD, SHERIDAN 82801 Radiologist: DONAHUE,FRANCIS I -------------------------------------------------------------------------- RADIOLOGY REPORT Report: Maceration posteriorly horn medial meniscus with almost total displacement of the medial meniscus into the medial gutter. Opposing joint surface bone marrow edema and marginal osteophytes. There is extensive grade IV chondromalacia of the medial joint compartment. Synovitis medial gutter No tears of the lateral meniscus. Extensive low-grade chondromalacia and marginal osteophytes. Chronic ACL tear, intact PCL Medial and lateral collateral support structures intact Extensor mechanism is intact. Patella anatomically aligned with extensive low-grade chondromalacia of patellofemoral joint with marginal osteophytes about the patella. Patellofemoral ligaments intact. Small popliteal cyst. No joint effusion. Impression: Severe osteoarthritis medial joint compartment, moderate osteoarthritis patellofemoral joint ACL deficient knee, see above comments =========================================================================
========================================================================= Procedure/Test Name: KNEE 3 VIEWS Date/Time Exam Performed: 20 Apr 2012 @ 1431 Ordering Location: SHERIDAN VAMC Requesting Provider: YAPUNCICH,VICTOR P Reasons for Study: Right knee pain following injury Clinical History: National Patient Flag Reason for request: Right knee injury and subsequent pain Performing Location: SHERIDAN VAMC 1898 FORT ROAD, SHERIDAN 82801 Radiologist: WEIN,GREGORY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- RADIOLOGY REPORT Report: Comparison: None Technique: Three views. Findings: No fracture, dislocation or bone destruction. Chronic appearing 19-mm heterotopic ossification posterior to the proximal tibia. Degenerative change of the proximal tibiofemoral articulation. Severe narrowing of the medial joint compartment. Prominent peripheral osteophytes. Osteophyte suggested involving the articular surface of the lateral femoral condyle. Degenerative spurring intercondylar notch. Mild degenerative change patellofemoral articulation. Small joint effusion. Impression: Moderate degenerative change. No definite fracture. Consider MRI..
For a change of pace, here's an MRI of my brain tumor!
========================================================================= Procedure/Test Name: BRAIN W/WO IV CONTRAST (MRI) Date/Time Exam Performed: 01 Jun 2012 @ 1015 Ordering Location: SHERIDAN VAMC Requesting Provider: YAPUNCICH,VICTOR P Reasons for Study: Follow up brain tumor Clinical History: National Patient Flag CREATININE 4/19/12 13:59 1.2 *************************** Collection DT Spec CREAT CR-eGFR 04/19/2012 13:59 SERUM 1.2 66.6 Reason for requesting MRI: Follow up brain tumor - Pt has follow up appt with Denver neurosurgery on 6/13/12 @ 0830 Does the patient have ESRD? No Does the patient have an eGFR < 60ml/min in the last 30 days? No Does the patient have acute kidney injury and/or significant liver disease? No Does the patient have a liver or kidney transplant? No Performing Location: SHERIDAN VAMC 1898 FORT ROAD, SHERIDAN 82801 Radiologist: WEIN,GREGORY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- RADIOLOGY REPORT Report: MRI of the brain with and without contrast Comparison: 1/24/11 and multiple earlier studies.. Technique: 20 cc Multihance utilized. Findings: Increased T2 signal identified in the left superior medulla oblongata, left side of the pons, left brachium pontis, inferomedial left cerebellar hemisphere and superomedial left cerebellar hemisphere sparing the vermis. In addition there is mild prominence of the left brachium pontis which effaces the left side of the fourth ventricle. this is not enhance. No change in the size and distribution of the abnormality compared to studies dating back to 5/3/7. Scattered areas of increased T2 signal identified in the flair pulse sequence throughout the white matter tracks of the cerebral hemispheres. These are stable. In a patient of this age this may represent chronic microangiopathic ischemic white matter change. No evidence of abnormal enhancement. Corpus callosum, optic chiasm , pituitary gland and clivus normal for age. Mild volume loss not advanced for age. No acute infarction. Signal abnormality involving the inferior medial right frontal cortex is noted which is stable compared to prior exams and may represent evidence of remote posttraumatic encephalomalacia. Prominent perivascular spaces in the inferior basal ganglia redemonstrated and unchanged. Perivascular space versus small lacunar infarction right periventricular temporal lobe white matter is stable.. Impression: Increased T2 signal identified in the left superior medulla oblongata, left side of the pons, left brachium pontis, inferomedial left cerebellar hemisphere and superomedial left cerebellar hemisphere sparing the vermis. In addition there is mild prominence of the left brachium pontis which effaces the left side of the fourth ventricle. This may represent a low grade glioma. No change from prior studies. No new findings.
Procedure/Test Name: KNEE RIGHT W/O (MRI) Date/Time Exam Performed: 13 Feb 2013 @ 0842 Ordering Location: SHERIDAN VAMC Requesting Provider: YAPUNCICH,VICTOR P Reasons for Study: rt knee pain Clinical History: National Patient Flag CREATININE 2/7/13 08:53 1.4 H ******************** Collection DT Spec CREAT CR-eGFR 02/07/2013 08:53 SERUM 1.4 H 55.5 L Reason for requesting MRI: Right knee pain Does the patient have ESRD? No Does the patient have an eGFR < 60ml/min in the last 30 days? No Does the patient have acute kidney injury and/or significant liver disease? No Does the patient have a liver or kidney transplant? No Performing Location: SHERIDAN VAMC 1898 FORT ROAD, SHERIDAN 82801 Radiologist: MOUBRY,RONDLE M -------------------------------------------------------------------------- RADIOLOGY REPORT Report: MRI right knee: As demonstrated on plain film radiograph there is medial compartment space narrowing with degenerative changes of the knee. There is some increased signal within the anterior cruciate ligament suggesting partial tear. The posterior cruciate ligament is intact. Quadriceps tendon and patellar ligaments are grossly intact. Heterogeneous marrow is seen in the distal aspect of the femur suggesting some hematogenous marrow. Clinical correlation recommended i.e. does patient have chronic illness. The medial and lateral retinacula appear intact. Small suprapatellar bursal joint effusion is seen. There is some thinning of the posterior patellar cartilage consistent with chondromalacia patella. Medial and lateral collateral ligaments are intact. There are degenerative changes of the anterior and posterior horns of the medial and lateral menisci with horizontal tear of the posterior horn medial meniscus. There is thinning of the anterior and posterior horns of the lateral meniscus. Impression: Degenerative changes. Heterogeneous bone marrow signal. Does the patient have a chronic illness? Degenerative changes of the knee with tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Partial tear/tendinosis of the anterior cruciate ligament. ========================================================================= Procedure/Test Name: KNEE 2 VIEW RIGHT Date/Time Exam Performed: 13 Feb 2013 @ 0841 Ordering Location: SHERIDAN VAMC Requesting Provider: YAPUNCICH,VICTOR P Reasons for Study: to be done in conjunction w/MRI per DVA Clinical History: National Patient Flag Reason for request: rt knee pain Performing Location: SHERIDAN VAMC 1898 FORT ROAD, SHERIDAN 82801 Radiologist: BEST,ALAN C -------------------------------------------------------------------------- RADIOLOGY REPORT Report: Comparison: MRI right knee from the same time, and radiographs 4/20/2012 Findings: Since prior exam there has been progression of medial compartment joint space narrowing, now severe. Mild lateral compartment and moderate patellofemoral compartment joint space loss. Increased patellar osteophytes. Unchanged 1.8-cm heterotopic ossification posterior soft tissues of the proximal leg. Impression: Progression of severe medial compartment degenerative changes and joint space loss. ========================================================================= Procedure/Test Name: KNEE LEFT W/O (MRI) Date/Time Exam Performed: 22 Aug 2013 @ 1339 Ordering Location: SHERIDAN VAMC Requesting Provider: YAPUNCICH,VICTOR P Reasons for Study: knee pain Clinical History: Reason for requesting MRI: knee pain CREATININE 2/27/13 08:33 1.4 H *************************** Collection DT Spec CR-eGFR 07/02/2013 12:52 PLAS 51.3 L Does the patient have ESRD, an eGFR < 60ml/min in the last 30 days, acute kidney injury or transplant and/or significant liver disease or transplant? No National Patient Flag Performing Location: SHERIDAN VAMC 1898 FORT ROAD, SHERIDAN 82801 Radiologist: WEIN,GREGORY -------------------------------------------------------------------------- RADIOLOGY REPORT Report: MRI of the left knee. Technique: Routine noncontrast MRI of the knee performed. The study is limited due to patient motion Findings: Osseous structures: No acute fracture. Gross narrowing medial joint compartment with bone-on-bone appearance and complete denudation of large areas of medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau cartilage. Severe grade 2 and 3 chondromalacia lateral compartment. The multiple large peripheral osteophytes. Moderate joint effusion.. Cruciate ligaments: The anterior cruciate ligament is severely degenerated but probably not torn. The posterior cruciate ligament intact.. Menisci: There is severe maceration of the body and posterior horn of the medial meniscus which is displaced into the medial gutter. Moderate degeneration lateral meniscus without tear.. Collateral ligaments: The tibial collateral ligament is effaced by the large medial osteophytes are grossly intact. The tibial collateral ligament intact. Patella and extensor mechanism: Diffuse grade 2 and 3 chondromalacia and patella with a superficial blistering and fissuring. similar chondromalacia of the trochlear cartilage with multiple large peripheral osteophytes. Patellar retinaculum intact. Quadriceps tendon and patellar tendons grossly intact with tendinosis of the distal patellar tendon. Edema of Hoffa's fat pad.. Surrounding soft tissues: No cyst or mass. Posterolateral corner: Degenerative change. No acute fracture. There is popliteus tendinosis.. Impression: Advanced degenerative change detailed above. Maceration medial meniscus. Please see report for additional body/details. ========================================================================= Procedure/Test Name: KNEE 2 VIEW LEFT Date/Time Exam Performed: 22 Aug 2013 @ 1338 Ordering Location: SHERIDAN VAMC Requesting Provider: YAPUNCICH,VICTOR P Reasons for Study: knee pain Clinical History: National Patient Flag Reason for request: x-ray to be done in conjunction with MRI Performing Location: SHERIDAN VAMC 1898 FORT ROAD, SHERIDAN 82801 Radiologist: MOUBRY,RONDLE M -------------------------------------------------------------------------- RADIOLOGY REPORT Report: Left knee: Medial compartment space narrowing is noted. A collar and then spurring is seen. Posterior patellar spurring is also noted. No fracture or dislocation. Bone mineral density is grossly normal. Impression: Degenerative changes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- There you have it, yet the VA refuses to do a damn thing except give me pain meds.
They even refused me physical therapy in the VA swimming pool due to the fact I
used up my limited number of billable visits, as the VA Managements rules.
It is the only effective therapy for me at this time due to severe pain,
and unable to use the land borne PT apparatus. the PT department has tried to
help as much as they were allowed to, but they had to follow managements
The folks in VISN-19 have their rules regarding weight, but I was told that
Black Hills VA Health Care System would have no problem doing my knees. I was also
told by a little bird that vets even heavier then me have had their knees fixed.
I am in pain 24/7/365, even with the pain meds. A few years back one of my primary
care docs even asked if I wanted to take morphine. M-O-R-P-H-I-N-E!!!! Like they
inject in battlefield serets.
Although I originally tore my ACL the Wednesday before Thanksgiving 2008, I didn't
get the 1st MRI till February 2009 for 2 reasons, One, I was going to NY for
Christmas to see family, siblings, parents, etc, some whom I hadn't seen in years,
so I didn't want to not go because of surgery, or whatever they do to fix ACLs.
Secondly, I had to setup an appointment with a VA over 330+ miles away, the
closest one to me that had an orthopedic department, although they could have done
it here in Sheridan WY, as they had done with other vets who had situations that
prevented lengthy travel. In my case I had a car that I didn't even leave town with
yet they wanted me to drive almost 700 miles round trip, in my old beater car,
actually a Ford Aerostar minivan, but still, it was old. I white knuckled my drive
down to the Cheyenne VA that winter, fearful of a breakdown, or blizzard, or just
the vehicle crapping out. I still have that same vehicle here today, and still
throwing money into the money pit. There is another option, the DAV Van to get
there and back is usually a 3-4 day event, so after the surgery, all the Post-Op
visits would take 1/2 week, just so they, the upper management and bean-counters
could get their performance bonuses!
My last letter and response to this issue to the director at the Sheridan VA, Ms.
Deb Hirshmann, she just blew me off anf told me to go and complain to the Chief of
Staff for the docs, as she didn't want to deal with it. Propably didn't want to
ruin her retirement/performance BONUS!
For 6 YEARS I have lived in Constant Pain, only to have it get worse with each
passing day. My physical therapist once said, when I asked about my leg braces,
and when to wear them, she said it doesn't matter, as your knees are so screwed
up, they are bone on bone now, and you'll be getting new knees soon (That was
almost 2 years since she said this comment.) so don't worry about wearing them,
as they will not help.
Friday, September 26, 2014
Fw: "South Carolina 5th Cir. Top Prosecutor Called SC Police Shooting a 'Clean Shot' & should recuse Himself and his Office from Prosecuting this Case!"
Levar Jones was shot by a (now) former member of the South Carolina Highway Patrol earlier this month. The disturbing video hit national media today, showing that Sean Groubert, the officer in question, wildly discharged his firearm as Jones attempted to comply with the officer's request to produce identification. Groubert had taken valuable time out of his day, during the middle of the capital city's rush hour, to write Jones a $25 ticket for a seatbelt violation.
After being suspended pending an investigation, Groubert was fired, and prosecutors pressed felony charges today.
One might be tempted to levy some praise on Richland County, and on the South Carolina Department of Public Safety, for handling the matter in a swift and egalitarian manner. These parties did what many police departments have not by firing and charging the officer in question.
But that ending just seems a little bit too perfect for South Carolina, now doesn't it? The state's been known for its criminal justice fumbles, and deeper digging shows that you can add this one to the list.
Enter Dan Johnson, the solicitor of South Carolina's fifth circuit. For the uninitiated, South Carolina has its citizens elect the top prosecutor in each part of the state, with that prosecutor hiring a team of assistants to handle most cases.
In the immediate wake of the shooting, having viewed the video tape, Johnson called the incident a "clean shot." FITSNews and the DailyBanter have both reported that Johnson told the chief of the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) that the use of force was warranted.
Dan Johnson has been accused of sexually harassing "multiple women" in his own office. He's been accused of using a firearm to threaten the life of an FBI agent. He's also alleged to have had an affair, then used his position to make difficult the life of the man married to his mistress.
Johnson's questionable background not withstanding, his past employment sheds some light on why he might claim that this shooting was "clean," and it also suggests that he may be unfit to prosecute this particular case.
According to his bio:
He served as Chief Deputy and Legal Counsel for the Richland County Sheriff's Department, where he worked for eight years. While there he assisted the Sheriff in directing the county's law enforcement programs and performing various legal and administrative duties to ensure the strict enforcement of state and local laws relating to the public's safety and welfare.Johnson is an eight-year veteran of the Richland Police Department, and while prosecution personnel and local police often have a cushy relationship, that past, combined with his statements on this case, call into question his ability to oversee this particular case.
Rogue cops and lone actors are scary, especially if you're a black man in America. Johnson, who himself is black, presents perhaps an even greater problem. When the chief executor of the law in one of South Carolina's largest counties provides his personal stamp of approval to an incident so clearly unlawful, what does that suggest about the system?
After reviewing a report from SLED, and under tremendous pressure from local and national forces, Johnson's office did press charges against Lance Corporal Groubert.
But Johnson, and potentially his office, should recuse themselves from this case. His judgment has been compromised, and his credibility to prosecute this crime has been undermined by his public statement on the lawfulness of the act.
And for the love of God, fine people of Richland County - it's time to vote out the alleged sexual harasser who believes that the officers patrolling the streets of your country should have open season on young black men. It's far past time to eradicate this disease.
Friday, September 19, 2014
Another Official Message, filled with LIES & Bullshit from Dirty Energy's Congressperson, Cynthia Lummis!
September 19, 2014
200 Smith Street
Sheridan, WY 82801-3857
Thank you for contacting me regarding production tax credit (PTC) for wind energy manufacturers. I appreciate hearing from you.
As you may know, since 1992 the wind energy industry has enjoyed a unique tax credit that allows them special tax treatment for each kilowatt hour produced. Then, in 2010 under the stimulus bill, a new program was established that paid wind energy companies a cash payment roughly equivalent to what they would have gotten with the tax credit. Since then, 205 recipients have received more than $7.8 billion tax-payer dollars in direct payments to support their wind energy business. The cash payment program expired on December 31, 2011, and the PTC was set to expire on December 31, 2012. The program was extended for one year, and expanded to include any projects that begin the process of construction this year, in the fiscal cliff deal passed in early January.
While I believe that an "all of the above" energy strategy for our country is laudable, the Solyndra case highlights that we must pay careful attention to the amount of tax-payer dollars we funnel to inefficient and ineffective sources of energy that cannot survive absent government subsidies. Data shows that each time the PTC for wind lapsed since 1992, wind energy production declined, suggesting that the wind energy industry simply cannot stand on its own as a marketable business. However, that may be changing as recently many in the wind energy industry have now publically supported a phase out of the PTC. I support that idea.
Every source of energy has a trade-off, and I believe those trade-offs must be recognized if we are to honestly assess our nation's energy portfolio. We certainly need a diversified energy portfolio, but we deceive ourselves if we believe we can solely depend on one source or another. Instead, we must focus on finding ways to use traditional energy resources in a cleaner and more efficient manner, while smartly investing in research and technology that will help us bring viable alternative energy sources to market. To that end, I will certainly take your opinion into consideration should the issue come before me for a vote.
Thank you again for taking the time to write to me. I value your input. If you haven't done so already, I would like to encourage you to visit my website at www.lummis.house.gov. There you can sign up to receive my newsletter, and have access to a wealth of other information. I won't flood your email box, but I will provide you with updates once in a while about activities in Washington that affect our lives in Wyoming. I hope you will sign up so that we can stay in close touch, and I look forward to seeing you in Wyoming.
Cynthia M. Lummis
Member of Congress, Village-Idiot and Slave To Dirty-Energy
Tuesday, September 16, 2014
Saturday, September 13, 2014
Saturday, September 6, 2014
|"Out of all the possible speakers the Wyoming State Bar could have invited to deliver the keynote address for its Sept. 10 annual banquet in Cheyenne, the honor predictably and appallingly went to Dick Cheney. We realize the former vice president is an alleged war-criminal, but seriously? WTF?" |
Thursday, August 28, 2014
"Tri County Animal Shelter"
Kim Stephens - Animal Shelter Supervisor
6707 Animal Shelter Rd., Hughesville, MD 20637
Phone #: 301-932-1713 or 800-903-1992
CUSTOMER SERVICE: 10:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m. M-F and 8:00 a.m.-3:30 p.m. Sat
I received this response from Charles County:
Charles County Government
We have been made aware of the video. As the Charles County Chief of Animal Control, I am responsible for day-to-day operations at the Tri-County Animal Shelter (TCAS) located in Hughesville, Md. Recently, I became aware of a video posted on Facebook depicting an interaction between a TCAS employee and an animal in the shelter’s care. The behavior depicted in the video is inconsistent with adopted TCAS practices and procedures, and will be thoroughly investigated.
C. Edward Tucker, Chief Charles County Animal Control
Thursday, August 14, 2014
Not a Tea Party, a Confederate Party!
Tea Partiers say you don't understand them because you don't understand American history. That's probably true, but not in the way they want you to think.
Late in 2012, I came out of the Lincoln movie with two historical mysteries to solve:
- How did the two parties switch places regarding the South, white supremacy, and civil rights? In Lincoln's day, a radical Republican was an abolitionist, and when blacks did get the vote, they almost unanimously voted Republican. Today, the archetypal Republican is a Southern white, and blacks are almost all Democrats. How did American politics get from there to here?
- One of the movie's themes was how heavily the war's continuing carnage weighed on Lincoln. (It particularly came through during Grant's guided tour of the Richmond battlefield.) Could any cause, however lofty, justify this incredible slaughter? And yet, I realized, Lincoln was winning. What must the Confederate leaders have been thinking, as an even larger percentage of their citizens died, as their cities burned, and as the accumulated wealth of generations crumbled? Where was their urge to end this on any terms, rather than wait for complete destruction?
The first question took some work, but yielded readily to patient googling. I wrote up the answer in "A Short History of White Racism in the Two-Party System". The second turned out to be much deeper than I expected, and set off a reading project that has eaten an enormous amount of my time over the last two years. (Chunks of that research have shown up in posts like "Slavery Lasted Until Pearl Harbor", "Cliven Bundy and the Klan Komplex", and my review of Ta-Nehisi Coates' article on reparations.) Along the way, I came to see how I (along with just about everyone I know) have misunderstood large chunks of American history, and how that misunderstanding clouds our perception of what is happening today.
Who really won the Civil War? The first hint at how deep the second mystery ran came from the biography Jefferson Davis: American by William J. Cooper. In 1865, not only was Davis not agonizing over how to end the destruction, he wanted to keep it going longer. He disapproved of Lee's surrender at Appomattox, and when U. S. troops finally captured him, he was on his way to Texas, where an intact army might continue the war.
That sounded crazy until I read about Reconstruction. In my high school history class, Reconstruction was a mysterious blank period between Lincoln's assassination and Edison's light bulb. Congress impeached Andrew Johnson for some reason, the transcontinental railroad got built, corruption scandals engulfed the Grant administration, and Custer lost at Little Big Horn. But none of it seemed to have much to do with present-day events.
And oh, those blacks Lincoln emancipated? Except for Booker T. Washington and George Washington Carver, they vanished like the Lost Tribes of Israel. They wouldn't re-enter history until the 1950s, when for some reason they still weren't free.
Here's what my teachers' should have told me: "Reconstruction was the second phase of the Civil War. It lasted until 1877, when the Confederates won." I think that would have gotten my attention.
It wasn't just that Confederates wanted to continue the war. They did continue it, and they ultimately prevailed. They weren't crazy, they were just stubborn.
The Lost Cause. At about the same time my American history class was leaving a blank spot after 1865, I saw Gone With the Wind, which started filling it in like this: Sadly, the childlike blacks weren't ready for freedom and full citizenship. Without the discipline of their white masters, many became drunks and criminals, and they raped a lot of white women. Northern carpetbaggers used them (and no-account white scalawags) as puppets to control the South, and to punish the planter aristocrats, who prior to the war had risen to the top of Southern society through their innate superiority and virtue.
But eventually the good men of the South could take it no longer, so they formed the Ku Klux Klan to protect themselves and their communities. They were never able to restore the genteel antebellum society — that Eden was gone with the wind, a noble but ultimately lost cause — but they were eventually able to regain the South's honor and independence. Along the way, they relieved their beloved black servants of the onerous burden of political equality, until such time as they might become mature enough to bear it responsibly.
That telling of history is now named for its primary proponent, William Dunning. It is false in almost every detail. If history is written by the winners, Dunning's history is the clearest evidence that the Confederates won. [see endnote 1]
Margaret Mitchell's 1936 novel had actually toned it down a little. To feel the full impact of Dunning-school history, you need to read Thomas Dixon's 1905 best-seller, The Clansman: a historical romance of the Ku Klux Klan. Or watch the 1915 silent movie made from it, The Birth of a Nation, which was the most popular film of all time until Gone With the Wind broke its records.
The iconic hooded Klansman on his horse, the Knight of the Invisible Empire, was the Luke Skywalker of his day.
The first modern war. The Civil War was easy to misunderstand at the time, because there had never been anything like it. It was a total mobilization of society, the kind Europe wouldn't see until World War I. The Civil War was fought not just with cannons and bayonets, but with railroads and factories and an income tax.
If the Napoleonic Wars were your model, then it was obvious that the Confederacy lost in 1865: Its capital fell, its commander surrendered, its president was jailed, and its territories were occupied by the opposing army. If that's not defeat, what is?
But now we have a better model than Napoleon: Iraq.
After the U.S. forces won on the battlefield in 1865 and shattered the organized Confederate military, the veterans of that shattered army formed a terrorist insurgency that carried on a campaign of fire and assassination throughout the South until President Hayes agreed to withdraw the occupying U. S. troops in 1877. Before and after 1877, the insurgents used lynchings and occasional pitched battles to terrorize those portions of the electorate still loyal to the United States. In this way they took charge of the machinery of state government, and then rewrote the state constitutions to reverse the postwar changes and restore the supremacy of the class that led the Confederate states into war in the first place. 
By the time it was all over, the planter aristocrats were back in control, and the three constitutional amendments that supposedly had codified the U.S.A's victory over the C.S.A.– the 13th, 14th, and 15th — had been effectively nullified in every Confederate state. The Civil Rights Acts had been gutted by the Supreme Court, and were all but forgotten by the time similar proposals resurfaced in the 1960s. Blacks were once again forced into hard labor for subsistence wages, denied the right to vote, and denied the equal protection of the laws. Tens of thousands of them were still physically shackled and subject to being whipped, a story historian Douglas Blackmon told in his Pulitzer-winning Slavery By Another Name.
So Lincoln and Grant may have had their mission-accomplished moment, but ultimately the Confederates won. The real Civil War — the one that stretched from 1861 to 1877 — was the first war the United States lost.
The missed opportunity. Today, historians like Eric Foner and Douglas Egerton portray Reconstruction as a missed opportunity to avoid Jim Crow and start trying to heal the wounds of slavery a century sooner. Following W.E.B. DuBois' iconoclastic-for-1935 Black Reconstruction, they see the freedmen as actors in their own history, rather than mere pawns or victims of whites. As a majority in Mississippi and South Carolina, and a substantial voting bloc across the South, blacks briefly used the democratic system to try to better their lot. If the federal government had protected the political process from white terrorism, black (and American) history could have taken an entirely different path.
In particular, 1865 was a moment when reparations and land reform were actually feasible. Late in the war, some of Lincoln's generals — notably Sherman — had mitigated their slave-refugee problem by letting emancipated slaves farm small plots on the plantations that had been abandoned by their Confederate owners. Sick or injured animals unable to advance with the Army were left behind for the slaves to nurse back to health and use. (Hence "forty acres and a mule".) Sherman's example might have become a land-reform model for the entire Confederacy, dispossessing the slave-owning aristocrats in favor of the people whose unpaid labor had created their wealth.
Instead, President Johnson (himself a former slave-owner from Tennessee) was quick to pardon the aristocrats and restore their lands.  That created a dynamic that has been with us ever since: Early in Reconstruction, white and black working people sometimes made common cause against their common enemies in the aristocracy. But once it became clear that the upper classes were going to keep their ill-gotten holdings, freedmen and working-class whites were left to wrestle over the remaining slivers of the pie. Before long, whites who owned little land and had never owned slaves had become the shock troops of the planters' bid to restore white supremacy.
Along the way, the planters created rhetoric you still hear today: The blacks were lazy and would rather wait for gifts from the government than work (in conditions very similar to slavery). In this way, the idle planters were able to paint the freedmen as parasites who wanted to live off the hard work of others.
The larger pattern. But the enduring Confederate influence on American politics goes far beyond a few rhetorical tropes. The essence of the Confederate worldview is that the democratic process cannot legitimately change the established social order, and so all forms of legal and illegal resistance are justified when it tries.
That worldview is alive and well. During last fall's government shutdown and threatened debt-ceiling crisis, historian Garry Wills wrote about our present-day Tea Partiers: "The presiding spirit of this neo-secessionism is a resistance to majority rule."
The Confederate sees a divinely ordained way things are supposed to be, and defends it at all costs. No process, no matter how orderly or democratic, can justify fundamental change.
When in the majority, Confederates protect the established order through democracy. If they are not in the majority, but have power, they protect it through the authority of law. If the law is against them, but they have social standing, they create shams of law, which are kept in place through the power of social disapproval. If disapproval is not enough, they keep the wrong people from claiming their legal rights by the threat of ostracism and economic retribution. If that is not intimidating enough, there are physical threats, then beatings and fires, and, if that fails, murder.
That was the victory plan of Reconstruction. Black equality under the law was guaranteed by the 14th Amendment. But in the Confederate mind, no democratic process could legitimate such a change in the social order. It simply could not be allowed to stand, and it did not stand.
In the 20th century, the Confederate pattern of resistance was repeated against the Civil Rights movement. And though we like to claim that Martin Luther King won, in many ways he did not. School desegregation, for example, was never viewed as legitimate, and was resisted at every level. And it has been overcome. By most measures, schools are as segregated as ever, and the opportunities in white schools still far exceed the opportunities in non-white schools.
Today, ObamaCare cannot be accepted. No matter that it was passed by Congress, signed by the President, found constitutional by the Supreme Court, and ratified by the people when they re-elected President Obama. It cannot be allowed to stand, and so the tactics for destroying it get ever more extreme. The point of violence has not yet been reached, but the resistance is still young.
Violence is a key component of the present-day strategy against abortion rights, as Judge Myron Thompson's recent ruling makes clear. Legal, political, social, economic, and violent methods of resistance mesh seamlessly. The Alabama legislature cannot ban abortion clinics directly, so it creates reasonable-sounding regulations the clinics cannot satisfy, like the requirement that abortionists have admitting privileges at local hospitals. Why can't they fulfill that requirement? Because hospitals impose the reasonable-sounding rule that their doctors live and practice nearby, while many Alabama abortionists live out of state. The clinics can't replace them with local doctors, because protesters will harass the those doctors' non-abortion patients and drive the doctors out of any business but abortion. A doctor who chooses that path will face threats to his/her home and family. And doctors who ignore such threats have been murdered.
Legislators, of course, express horror at the murder of doctors, just as the pillars of 1960s Mississippi society expressed horror at the Mississippi Burning murders, and the planter aristocrats shook their heads sadly at the brutality of the KKK and the White Leagues. But the strategy is all of a piece and always has been. Change cannot stand, no matter what documents it is based on or who votes for them. If violence is necessary, so be it.
Unbalanced. This is not a universal, both-sides-do-it phenomenon. Compare, for example, the responses to the elections of our last two presidents. Like many liberals, I will go to my grave believing that if every person who went to the polls in 2000 had succeeded in casting the vote s/he intended, George W. Bush would never have been president. I supported Gore in taking his case to the Supreme Court. And, like Gore, once the Court ruled in Bush's favor — incorrectly, in my opinion — I dropped the issue.
For liberals, the Supreme Court was the end of the line. Any further effort to replace Bush would have been even less legitimate than his victory. Subsequently, Democrats rallied around President Bush after 9/11, and I don't recall anyone suggesting that military officers refuse his orders on the grounds that he was not a legitimate president.
Barack Obama, by contrast, won a huge landslide in 2008, getting more votes than any president in history. And yet, his legitimacy has been questioned ever since. The Birther movement was created out of whole cloth, there never having been any reason to doubt the circumstances of Obama's birth. Outrageous conspiracy theories of voter fraud — millions and millions of votes worth — have been entertained on no basis whatsoever. Immediately after Obama took office, the Oath Keeper movement prepared itself to refuse his orders.
A black president calling for change, who owes most of his margin to black voters — he himself is a violation of the established order. His legitimacy cannot be conceded.
Confederates need guns. The South is a place, but the Confederacy is a worldview. To this day, that worldview is strongest in the South, but it can be found all over the country (as are other products of Southern culture, like NASCAR and country music). A state as far north as Maine has a Tea Party governor.
Gun ownership is sometimes viewed as a part of Southern culture, but more than that, it plays a irreplaceable role in the Confederate worldview. Tea Partiers will tell you that the Second Amendment is our protection against "tyranny". But in practice tyranny simply means a change in the established social order, even if that change happens — maybe especially if it happens — through the democratic processes defined in the Constitution. If the established social order cannot be defended by votes and laws, then it will be defended by intimidation and violence. How are We the People going to shoot abortion doctors and civil rights activists if we don't have guns?
Occasionally this point becomes explicit, as when Nevada Senate candidate Sharron Angle said this:
You know, our Founding Fathers, they put that Second Amendment in there for a good reason and that was for the people to protect themselves against a tyrannical government. And in fact Thomas Jefferson said it's good for a country to have a revolution every 20 years. I hope that's not where we're going, but, you know, if this Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second Amendment remedies and saying my goodness what can we do to turn this country around? I'll tell you the first thing we need to do is take Harry Reid out.
Angle wasn't talking about anything more "tyrannical" than our elected representatives voting for things she didn't like (like ObamaCare or stimulus spending). If her side can't fix that through elections, well then, the people who do win those elections will just have to be intimidated or killed. Angle doesn't want it to come to that, but if liberals won't yield peacefully to the conservative minority, what other choice is there?
Gun-rights activist Larry Pratt doesn't even seem regretful:
"The Second Amendment is not for hunting, it's not even for self-defense," Pratt explained in his Leadership Institute talk. Rather, it is "for restraining tyrannical tendencies in government. Especially those in the liberal, tyrannical end of the spectrum. There is some restraint, and even if the voters of Brooklyn don't hold them back, it may be there are other ways that their impulses are somewhat restrained. That's the whole idea of the Second Amendment."
So the Second Amendment is there not to defend democracy, but to fix what the progressive "voters of Brooklyn" get wrong.
It's not a Tea Party. The Boston Tea Party protest was aimed at a Parliament where the colonists had no representation, and at an appointed governor who did not have to answer to the people he ruled. Today's Tea Party faces a completely different problem: how a shrinking conservative minority can keep change at bay in spite of the democratic processes defined in the Constitution. That's why they need guns. That's why they need to keep the wrong people from voting in their full numbers.
These right-wing extremists have misappropriated the Boston patriots and the Philadelphia founders because their true ancestors — Jefferson Davis and the Confederates — are in poor repute. 
But the veneer of Bostonian rebellion easily scrapes off; the tea bags and tricorn hats are just props. The symbol Tea Partiers actually revere is the Confederate stars and bars. Let a group of right-wingers ramble for any length of time, and you will soon hear that slavery wasn't really so bad, that Andrew Johnson was right, that Lincoln shouldn't have fought the war, that states have the rights of nullification and secession, that the war wasn't really about slavery anyway, and a lot of other Confederate mythology that (until recently) had left me asking, "Why are we talking about this?"
By contrast, the concerns of the Massachusetts Bay Colony and its revolutionary Sons of Liberty are never so close to the surface. So no. It's not a Tea Party. It's a Confederate Party.
Our modern Confederates are quick to tell the rest of us that we don't understand them because we don't know our American history. And they're right. If you knew more American history, you would realize just how dangerous these people are.
 The other clear evidence stands in front of nearly every courthouse in the South: statues of Confederate heroes. You have to be blind not to recognize them as victory monuments. In the Jim Crow era, these stone sentries guarded the centers of civic power against Negroes foolish enough to try to register to vote or claim their other constitutional rights.
In Away Down South: a history of Southern identity, James C. Cobb elaborates:
African Americans understood full well what monuments to the antebellum white regime were all about. When Charleston officials erected a statue of proslavery champion John C. Calhoun, "blacks took that statue personally," Mamie Garvin Fields recalled. After all, "here was Calhoun looking you in the face and telling you, 'Nigger, you may not be a slave but I'm back to see you stay in your places.' " In response, Fields explained, "we used to carry something with us, if we knew we would be passing that way, in order to deface that statue — scratch up the coat, break up the watch chain, try to knock off the nose. … [C]hildren and adults beat up John C. Calhoun so badly that the whites had to come back and put him way up high, so we couldn't get to him."
 The vocabulary of this struggle is illuminating. A carpetbagger was a no-account Northerner who arrived in the South with nothing more than the contents of a carpetbag. A scalawag was a lower-class Southern white who tried to rise above his betters in the post-war chaos. The class-based nature of these insults demonstrates who was authorizing this history: the planter aristocrats.
For a defense of the claim that the aristocrats intentionally led the South into war, see Douglas Egerton's Year of Meteors: Stephen Douglas, Abraham Lincoln, and the Election that Brought on the Civil War.
 Though Congress had to find other "high crimes and misdemeanors" for their bill of impeachment, Johnson's betrayal of the United States' battlefield victory was the real basis of the attempt to remove him.
 Jefferson Davis and the Confederates also misappropriated the Founders. It started with John Calhoun's Discourse on the Constitution and Government of the United States, published posthumously in 1851, which completely misrepresented the Founders and their Constitution. Calhoun's view (that the Union was a consortium of states with no directly relationship to the people) would have made perfect sense if the Constitution had begun "We the States" rather than "We the People".
Calhoun disagreed with Jefferson on one key point: All men are not created equal.
Modern conservatives who attribute their views to the Founders are usually unknowingly relying on Calhoun's false image of the Founders, which was passed down through Davis and from there spread widely in Confederate folklore.