WY State Rep Lynn Hutchings needs to think that "Bigotry is harmful to the mind, body and spirit"

"Bigotry is harmful to the mind, body and spirit"

 

"Homosexual behavior is harmful to the mind, body and spirit," WY state Rep. and Hatemongering Homophobe Extraordinaire Lynn Hutchings (R-Cheyenne) said. I wonder how she knows all this? Lynn is a hateful and angry black women, who was dumped by her gay lover because you can't change your sexual orientation. Hutchings is truly a sorry and pathetic lil' woman, and one of those fake christians who hates everyone except their kind, and wants everyone to worship their mythology and story book know as the bible. You're a sad, sad woman!

Hutchings, who is Black, called on supporters of gay marriage to "stop carpet-bagging on our civil rights movement," saying that there is no comparison between the two. Yet she forgets that this is a civil rights movement, just one that her prejudice and bigotry can't tolerate. I'm guessing tolerance is not part of her christianity? Hutchings is a damn hypocrite! She said she rejects the comparison because she believes that people choose to be gay. But they really don't there Lynn---did you choose to be black? Oh, I see, that's different. NO IT ISN'T, DAMMIT---Wake Up Woman, you hateful lil' women who is also a hypocrite and LIAR! Hutchings also said her ex-fiancé had once been gay and decided to become straight. (BULLSHIT- He was probably never gay, or he just liked to suck...) And then he became gay again because he was Lynn's fiancé, and that validated that he really was gay, as he described her as a dead ****. Now we know why he is gay!

You are a disgrace to Wyoming and America, and would have done real good in some prejudice society, like...

 

Good Night and Good Luck Bigot!

---

 

Bigoted WY State Rep Lynn Hutchings Contact Info-

Party:	Republican or RWNJ
District:	House District 42
Counties:	Laramie

Contact Information:
P.O. Box 9603
Cheyenne, WY 82003
Home - (307) 316-0858 Contact Rep. Lynn Hutchings via email. Website: legisweb.state.wy.us/LegislatorSummary/LegDetail.aspx?LegID=1997 Cheyenne Office: State Capitol, Wyoming 82002 Phone: (307) 777-7852 Fax: (307) 777-5466 Cheyenne Office: P.O. Box 9603 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003 Phone: (307) 316-0858 Fax:
Lynn.Hutchings@wyoleg.gov

Education: Bigot HS 1977 University of Bigotry- BS Major- Hatemongering 1981

 

---

"Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral." -Paolo Friere-

Save America's Wolves From the Liars! And their Bullets!

President Obama and his Interior Secretary, Ken Salazar, a Colorado rancher, have adopted unjust and heartless "tea party" policies towards America's wolves. And the U.S. Congress is equally guilty in this ecological and ethical injustice. Wolves are highly intelligent, native, and vital natural predators that belong on the land. Too many brutish ranchers and misguided hunters have unfairly demonized and maligned wolves for centuries. An American majority wants an end to demonization and massacre of America's wolves and other native wildlife.

---

Wolves are native, ecologically vital and beautiful members of the North American landscape. Wherever they live, wolves are remarkable, natural predators that keep their prey species healthy and strong. Wolves have been persecuted and massacred for centuries, due to human ignorance, intolerance and cruelty. It is the very opposite of the respect, admiration and protection they deserve. Wolves are highly social and very intelligent beings and like all canines, they are loyal and loving to their families, their wolf pack.

Brutally persecuting and killing such ecologically vital, sensitive, intelligent and family-oriented beings should be labeled what it is: unacceptable, criminal animal abuse and unacceptable, criminal killing. In days of old, when much of humanity was ruled by fear and ignorance, the terrible slaughter of natural predators was too often a sad part of the human condition. To perpetrate such brutality and unjustified killing of wolves and other natural predators, in this modern era with our deeper knowledge and understanding of earth science and ecology, is pathologically and ecologically criminal.

Too many cattle ranchers perpetuate deadly, hysterical myths and ridiculous exaggerations about depredation of cattle by wolves, which is statistically insignificant in every state. Wolves much prefer their wild prey. For instance, in the huge state of Wyoming there are 1,300,000 non-native cattle. Tens of thousands of cattle in Wyoming die every year due to weather, disease, birth complications and from eating poison plants, for which ranchers receive zero compensation. In 2011, the US Fish & Wildlife Service confirmed only 35 cattle taken by wolves in the entire state. 35 out of 1,300,000... that is statistically zero. Yet, Wyoming ranchers are foolishly compensated for such tiny losses and like other ranchers throughout the West, whine endlessly about wolves to anyone who will listen. Many of these ranchers constantly scheme and pressure federal and state politicians to kill wolves.

These ranchers should be ignored and they need serious therapy to deal with their collective neurosis regarding wolves. They feel entitled to continue a horrific tradition of unacceptable brutality, the same criminal brutality that earlier destroyed Native American people and culture and massacred native wildlife throughout the continent. Decent Americans can no longer allow them to have their way. It is disgraceful and unacceptable that any supposedly honest and decent American politician would listen to such destructive liars and then serve their cruel, unjust, and immoral demand that innocent wolves be condemned to death.

To add massive insult to massive injury, the rancher's non-native cattle graze on federal tax payer subsidized public lands that belong to all Americans, land that should be a haven for America's vital wolves and other native wildlife, including native bison, grizzly bears, mountain lions, prairie dogs, wolverines, coyotes and so many other amazing members of the continent's rich natural heritage. The massive numbers of non-native cattle grazing unsupervised throughout the arid West cause tremendous damage trampling across fragile ecosystems where they do not belong. The cattlemen's reign of terror against the wildlife and wild lands of the United States must permanently come to an end. Let their well deserved demise begin by stopping these federal tax payer-subsidized welfare ranchers, once and for all, from their vile, unjustified and unrelenting campaign of demonization and slaughter of America's wolves.

Many ecologically ignorant hunters and sadistic trappers relentlessly lobby to torture and slaughter natural predators that belong in every ecosystem. Wolves, like all natural predators, are miracles of evolution and keep every ecosystem they inhabit vibrant and healthy. Where wolves are present on the landscape, there are often more elk and deer, and these prey animals are healthier. No one would know such indisputable facts, by listening to the anti-wolf propaganda nonsense from hunter lobby groups such as the dishonest Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation. Most hunting organizations are only concerned with having more animals to kill without regard to ecology and ethics and the humane will of the non-hunting majority. They also must finally be restrained.

There should be no hunting or trapping of wolves and other natural predators. They are simply too important as living beings that create balance and ensure biodiversity within every ecosystem, just as nature intended. Nature controls their numbers very well without any help from wildlife managers and sport killers. Wildlife trapping is outlawed in 89 countries as out-dated and cruel, it's time to outlaw barbaric wildlife trapping in the US, as well. Wolves, as sentient, intelligent and family-oriented beings, feel intense pain and fear and suffer horribly just as humans would, when caught in a torturous steel trap or snared by a strangling cable. In the 21st century, no animal of the wild should be subject to such cruelty and torture.

Imagine your family dog, alone in the night, caught in a painful steel trap by a delicate paw or snared by its neck to slowly strangle or shot in its gut while a gleeful sport killer watches it suffer an agonizing death. And all this animal wants is to be free and get back to you, to its family pack. America's wolves are being persecuted, tortured and killed in this way, as you are reading this, in the "land of the free and home of the brave." Free to be what, a heartless and violent animal abuser?

Federal and state wildlife agencies that are now facilitating this shameful persecution and massacre of America's wolves are full partners in the deaths of thousands of innocent wolves. The rising death toll from these corrupt state government sanctioned wolf massacres is in addition to the annual slaughter of hundreds of wolves by the US Department of Agriculture's hideous Wildlife Services division. Wildlife Services is a federal tax payer-subsidized, paramilitary-like agency devoted to the mass killing of America's native predators and other wildlife that belong across the landscape, even though they are deemed unworthy of life by selfish cattlemen and farmers. This brutal federal agency established over a hundred years ago should never have been created and must be permanently shut down. Most Americans are unaware of this bizarre agency of wildlife killers, as powerful cattle and agribusiness interests have succeeded in foiling any Congressional oversight of Wildlife Services for decades.

When wolf defenders finally succeed in stopping this latest American wolf massacre, serious reform of these corrupt agencies must be implemented without delay. Wildlife Services must be defunded and dismantled. The mission of all state wildlife agencies must permanently shift away from serving cattlemen, agribusiness and the sport killer lobby. It's time that these corrupt state agencies evolve and change to reflect the kinder ethical values of the majority of American citizens who have themselves evolved and learned to treasure the country's natural heritage. Their primary mission must be the restoration, conservation and protection of America's wildlife and their habitat. That is an honorable mission to be proud of. We are supposed to be a democracy and an ethical country, after all.

A humane and wildlife-loving majority of Americans and wolf friends from around the world, demand an immediate end to the unjust demonization, persecution and slaughter of America's wolves. Wolves must be placed back on the Endangered Species List and permanently protected from further hateful propaganda and malicious fairy tales directed against them. More and more Americans believe wolves should be our national symbol, alongside the bald eagle, which would outlaw the killing of any wolf in the United States.

Wolves are vital, beautiful and amazing beings. To love wolves is to love life. Please help defend and protect them.
________________________________________________

Important Note to ALL wolf defenders:
After signing this petition and leaving a comment, please visit the best wolf defender blog on the web at... http://howlingforjustice.wordpress.com

Also, please support the heroic efforts of Predator Defense, at: predatordefense.org. This excellent, non-profit organization has been fighting to stop the mindless persecution and cruel massacre of all natural predators in the United States, since 1990.

 

"Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless
means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral." -Paolo Friere-

Four Falsehoods About Doctors And Guns Pushed By Conservative Media!

Hi Barbara,

Here is some info based on facts. I know it's a lot, but when people continue to mass e-mail misinformation regarding this issue in the interest of fermenting anger, distrust, fearmongering, hatred, resentment, faux outrage and even rebellion, they are doing a disservice to our republic, and all level-headed Americans who didn't fall into their trap of lies, misinformation, myths and deceit. This ignorance must be stopped today!

 

"Four Falsehoods About Doctors And Guns Pushed By Conservative Media"

After President Obama announced an executive action clarifying that doctors are permitted -- but not required -- to discuss gun safety with patients, conservatives in the media trumpeted a number of falsehoods, including the baseless claim that Obama is requiring doctors to report all gun owners to law enforcement.

 

1. Does executive action by the Obama administration require doctors to ask their patients about gun ownership?

 

2. Is the Obama administration requiring doctors to report individuals suspected of being a danger to the public to law enforcement?

 

3. Does the Obama administration executive action require doctors to report all gun owners to law enforcement?

 

4. Did the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 -- also known as Obamacare -- ever prevent doctors from discussing gun safety with patients?

 

CLAIM #1: Doctors Are Now Required To Ask Patients About Guns In The Home!

 

Rush Limbaugh: "Now Doctors Are Being Ordered, Instructed To Talk To Patients And Get Information From Them About Gun Ownership." From a transcript of Limbaugh's January 16 show, titled on his website, "Regime Deputizes Gun-Snitch Doctors":

 

LIMBAUGH: So now doctors are being ordered, instructed to talk to patients and get information from them about gun ownership, where they are in their house, who has access to them, where the ammunition is kept.  Doctors are now, quote, unquote, "permitted," unquote, to do this. It makes 'em deputies, agents of the state. And if they don't do it -- let's look at this the other way around.  Let's say patient X goes to a doctor. The patient's got a sore throat, runny nose.  The doctor does not ask the patient anything to do with the patient's guns. The patient then goes out and uses the guns sometime later and then the regime learns that the doctor didn't report that this patient indicated that he might be dangerous.

 

Look at the position this puts the doctors in. The doctors are now under the thumb of Obamacare. They had better comply. This is not a choice. Can you say hello to rapidly increasing, even higher and faster, malpractice insurance? They'd better comply. They'd better do as they're told. [The Rush Limbaugh Show, 1/16/13]

 

REALITY: Obama Executive Actions Clarifies That Doctors May Ask About Firearm Ownership At Their Own Discretion

 

Obama Administration: "The Affordable Care Act Does Not Prohibit Or Otherwise Regulate Communication Between Doctors And Patients, Including About Firearms." In a report issued by the White House outlining the Obama administration's proposals to curb gun violence announced on January 16, the administration clarified that doctors are permitted to ask their patients about gun safety but did not create any mandate requiring doctors to do so:

 

Doctors and other health care providers also need to be able to ask about firearms in their patients' homes and safe storage of those firearms, especially if their patients show signs of certain mental illnesses or if they have a young child or mentally ill family member at home. Some have incorrectly claimed that language in the Affordable Care Act prohibits doctors from asking their patients about guns and gun safety. Medical groups also continue to fight against state laws attempting to ban doctors from asking these questions. The Administration will issue guidance clarifying that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit or otherwise regulate communication between doctors and patients, including about firearms. [The White House, accessed 1/17/13]

 

CLAIM #2: The Obama Administration Is Changing The Rules Concerning When Doctors Can Report Dangerous Individuals To Law Enforcement

 

Fox's Sean Hannity: Obama Executive Action Is "Urging Doctors And, Quote, Other Health Care Providers, To Contact Authorities If They Arbitrarily Deem That A Patient Is A Threat To Themselves Or To Others." From the January 16 edition of Hannity on Fox News:

http://mediamatters.org/embed/static/clips/2013/01/17/28572/fnc-hannity-20130116-hannityguns

 

Limbaugh: Doctors "Must" Report Dangerous Individuals To Law Enforcement. From the January 16 edition of The Rush Limbaugh Show:

 

LIMBAUGH: Mental health professionals, therapists, if they detect that you might leave the office and go grab a gun and do something, they have to call and report you. And now doctors must do the same thing. [The Rush Limbaugh Show, 1/16/13]

 

REALITY: Obama Executive Action Reiterated That Federal Law Does Not Prohibit Doctors From Reporting Individuals Who Threaten Violence To Law Enforcement

 

Obama Administration Clarifies "Public Confusion" Over Whether Doctors Are Prohibited From Reporting Dangerous Individuals To Law Enforcement. The White House report contains no mandate that doctors must report suspicious individuals to the authorities, and rather it clarifies that doctors are not prohibited from contacting authorities about dangerous persons:

 

Doctors and other mental health professionals play an important role in protecting the safety of their patients and the broader community by reporting direct and credible threats of violence to the authorities. But there is public confusion about whether federal law prohibits such reports about threats of violence. The Department of Health and Human Services is issuing a letter to health care providers clarifying that no federal law prohibits these reports in any way. [The White House, accessed 1/17/13]

 

CLAIM #3: Executive Action By The Obama Administration Will Result In All Gun Owners Being Reported To The Authorities

 

Limbaugh: Obama's Goal Is To Ensure "What We Do Or Say" Is Reported To The Authorities. From the January 16 edition of The Rush Limbaugh Show:

 

LIMBAUGH: Again, folks, this is pushing people's buttons on purpose. This is gonna cause some people to snap. It might. This is going after the very reasonableness and sanity of people. It seems like the goal here is to get everybody on some kind of list and to have all kinds of people that we interact with end up reporting on what we do or say to hear to the government, to the, quote, unquote, the authorities. The authorities. That's a totalitarian word, "the authorities."

 

Why is Obama doing this? Why is he deliberately making people so upset? What's driving him? Don't ask me where the ACLU is. I mean, anything to get rid of guns, the ACLU's right there. Leftists are leftists, and that comes first with them. The ACLU as a civil rights organization is a bit of a laugher. They're just another branch of liberalism. [The Rush Limbaugh Show, 1/16/13]

 

Fox Regular Mark Levin: Executive Actions Part Of Obama Plan For "National Database" That Includes "All Innocent Law-Abiding Citizens Who Purchase Guns." During a January 16 appearance on Your World with Neil Cavuto on Fox News, Levin also urged Americans to "rise up" over his claim that the executive actions will "have doctors reporting their clients to the federal government": http://mediamatters.org/embed/static/clips/2013/01/17/28573/fnc-yourworld-20130116-levin

 

LEVIN: I think there are a couple things in here that are poison pills, though. The attempt to nationalize the medical profession and have doctors reporting their clients to the federal government. This is 1930s stuff. The American people need to rise up against that. The medical profession needs to say no. Also he clearly wants a national database where all innocent law-abiding citizens who purchase guns are in a national database. [Your World with Neil Cavuto, 1/16/13]

 

REALITY: There Is No Mention Of Gun Owner Data Collection In The Obama Executive Actions On Gun Violence

 

A Summary Of Gun Violence Prevention Measures Proposed By The Obama Administration Makes No Mention Of Requiring Doctors To Collect Information About Gun Owners. [The White House, accessed 1/17/13]

 

The Affordable Care Act Prohibits The Secretary Of Health And Human Services From Collecting Data On Gun Owners. [Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, accessed 1/17/13]

 

CLAIM #4: The Affordable Care Act Prohibits Doctors From Asking Patients About Gun Ownership

 

Fox News Legal Analyst Peter Johnson Jr.: "Explicitly [The Affordable Care Act] Says That There Cannot Be Questions About Guns In Homes." From the January 17 edition of Fox & Friends on Fox News: http://mediamatters.org/embed/static/clips/2013/01/17/28571/fnc-foxandfriends-20130117-pjjaca2

 

JOHNSON: But when you say to a doctor, "We're going to clarify your role under one of the executive orders," clarify whether doctors can ask patients about their guns in homes. We know under the Obamacare Act in 2010 explicitly the statute says that there cannot be questions about guns in homes, lawful possession of firearms in wellness programs, in programs dictating how people are feeling, and questionnaires and the like. So the subtle, or not so subtle, indication in this executive order memorandum is, yeah doctors you should really be looking at the issue of lawful guns in people's homes because it is in fact a health hazard. [Fox & Friends, 1/17/13]

 

Brietbart.com Contributor AWR Hawkins: "The Government Cannot Use Doctors To Collect 'Any Information Relating To The Lawful Ownership Or Possession Of A Firearm Or Ammunition.'" [Breitbart.com, 1/9/13]

 

REALITY: Firearm-Related Provisions In The Affordable Care Act Concern Prohibitions On Data Collection Of Gun Owners, Not The Doctor-Patient Relationship

 

Affordable Care Act Refers To Data Collection By The Secretary Of Health And Human Services, Not Doctors Conferring With Patients About Firearm Ownership. From the consolidated Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010:

 

'(2) LIMITATION ON DATA COLLECTION.--None of the authorities provided to the Secretary under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or an amendment made by that Act shall be construed to authorize or may be used for the collection of any information relating to--

 

''(A) the lawful ownership or possession of a firearm or ammunition;

 

''(B) the lawful use of a firearm or ammunition; or

 

''(C) the lawful storage of a firearm or ammunition [Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, accessed 1/17/13]

 

NBC News: "There Are Some Who Believe The Health-Care Law Outlaws Doctors From Asking Patients About Guns In Their Homes. But That's Not True." From a January 16 article by NBC deputy political editor Domenico Montanaro:

 

The vagueness of some of the directives may cause controversy, but only one specific one jumps out that may get some talking -- No. 16: "Clarify that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes."

 

There are some who believe the health-care law outlaws doctors from asking patients about guns in their homes. But that's not true.

 

What it does prohibit, however, is "employers and the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services from asking about gun ownership in many instances, and it prohibits HHS from collecting such data," according to the Kaiser Health Foundation. [NBC News, 1/16/13]

 

 

 

Best wishes always,
Bill Harasym

"Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral." -Paolo Friere-

Bill H sent you a video: ""Bob the ELK" Fixin' an ELK Leaf Salad!"

Howdy You All,

Check out my video if you haven't already, thanks!

 

Bill H. has shared a video with you on YouTube Here is my elk video! "Bob the ELK" Fixin' an ELK Leaf Salad! by Billy Beardog Bob chowing down on some foliage in Sheridan, Wyoming Help center • Email options • Report spam ©2013 YouTube, LLC 901 Cherry Ave, San Bruno, CA 94066