Showing posts with label media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label media. Show all posts

Sunday, February 6, 2011

"The Top 10 Things Sarah Palin, Republics, NeoCons, and RWNJ lie About Ronnie Reagan and His Legacy"




Sarah Palin has a little place in her heart for Ronnie and the Faux Legend. I bet the ranch on it, but if you sat Palin down and asked her about these following 10 lies, she would say all the lies are true. Any Takers?

Today will mark the 100th anniversary of President Reagan's birth, and all week, conservatives have been trying to outdo each others' remembrances of the great conservative icon. Senate Republicans spent much of Thursday singing Reagan's praise from the Senate floor, while conservative publications have been running non-stop commemorations. Meanwhile, the Republican National Committee and former GOP House Speaker Newt Gingrich are hoping to make a few bucks off the Gipper's centennial.




But Reagan was not the man conservatives claim he was. This image of Reagan as a conservative superhero is myth, created to untie the various factions of the right behind a common leader. In reality, Reagan was no conservative ideologue or flawless commander-in-chief. Reagan regularly strayed from conservative dogma — he raised taxes eleven times as president while tripling the deficit — and he often ended up on the wrong side of history, like when he vetoed an Anti-Apartheid bill.

Remind you of anything happening now?



ThinkProgress has compiled a list of the top 10 things conservatives rarely mention when talking about President Reagan:
1. Reagan was a serial tax raiser. As governor of California, Reagan "signed into law the largest tax increase in the history of any state up till then." Meanwhile, state spending nearly doubled. As president, Reagan "raised taxes in seven of his eight years in office," including four times in just two years. As former GOP Senator Alan Simpson, who called Reagan "a dear friend," told NPR, "Ronald Reagan raised taxes 11 times in his administration — I was there." "Reagan was never afraid to raise taxes," said historian Douglas Brinkley, who edited Reagan's memoir. Reagan the anti-tax zealot is "false mythology," Brinkley said.
2. Reagan nearly tripled the federal budget deficit. During the Reagan years, the debt increased to nearly $3 trillion, "roughly three times as much as the first 80 years of the century had done altogether." Reagan enacted a major tax cut his first year in office and government revenue dropped off precipitously. Despite the conservative myth that tax cuts somehow increase revenue, the government went deeper into debt and Reagan had to raise taxes just a year after he enacted his tax cut. Despite ten more tax hikes on everything from gasoline to corporate income, Reagan was never able to get the deficit under control.
3. Unemployment soared after Reagan's 1981 tax cuts. Unemployment jumped to 10.8 percent after Reagan enacted his much-touted tax cut, and it took years for the rate to get back down to its previous level. Meanwhile, income inequality exploded. Despite the myth that Reagan presided over an era of unmatched economic boom for all Americans, Reagan disproportionately taxed the poor and middle class, but the economic growth of the 1980′s did little help them. "Since 1980, median household income has risen only 30 percent, adjusted for inflation, while average incomes at the top have tripled or quadrupled," the New York Times' David Leonhardt noted.
4. Reagan grew the size of the federal government tremendously. Reagan promised "to move boldly, decisively, and quickly to control the runaway growth of federal spending," but federal spending "ballooned" under Reagan. He bailed out Social Security in 1983 after attempting to privatize it, and set up a progressive taxation system to keep it funded into the future. He promised to cut government agencies like the Department of Energy and Education but ended up adding one of the largest — the Department of Veterans' Affairs, which today has a budget of nearly $90 billion and close to 300,000 employees. He also hiked defense spending by over $100 billion a year to a level not seen since the height of the Vietnam war.
5. Reagan did little to fight a woman's right to choose. As governor of California in 1967, Reagan signed a bill to liberalize the state's abortion laws that "resulted in more than a million abortions." When Reagan ran for president, he advocated a constitutional amendment that would have prohibited all abortions except when necessary to save the life of the mother, but once in office, he "never seriously pursued" curbing choice.
6. Reagan was a "bellicose peacenik." He wrote in his memoirs that "[m]y dream…became a world free of nuclear weapons." "This vision stemmed from the president's belief that the biblical account of Armageddon prophesied nuclear war — and that apocalypse could be averted if everyone, especially the Soviets, eliminated nuclear weapons," the Washington Monthly noted. And Reagan's military buildup was meant to crush the Soviet Union, but "also to put the United States in a stronger position from which to establish effective arms control" for the the entire world — a vision acted out by Reagan's vice president, George H.W. Bush, when he became president.
7. Reagan gave amnesty to 3 million undocumented immigrants. Reagan signed into law a bill that made any immigrant who had entered the country before 1982 eligible for amnesty. The bill was sold as a crackdown, but its tough sanctions on employers who hired undocumented immigrants were removed before final passage. The bill helped 3 million people and millions more family members gain American residency. It has since become a source of major embarrassment for conservatives.
8. Reagan illegally funneled weapons to Iran. Reagan and other senior U.S. officials secretly sold arms to officials in Iran, which was subject to a an arms embargo at the time, in exchange for American hostages. Some funds from the illegal arms sales also went to fund anti-Communist rebels in Nicaragua — something Congress had already prohibited the administration from doing. When the deals went public, the Iran-Contra Affair, as it came to be know, was an enormous political scandal that forced several senior administration officials to resign.
9. Reagan vetoed a comprehensive anti-Apartheid act. which placed sanctions on South Africa and cut off all American trade with the country. Reagan's veto was overridden by the Republican-controlled Senate. Reagan responded by saying "I deeply regret that Congress has seen fit to override my veto," saying that the law "will not solve the serious problems that plague that country."
10. Reagan helped create the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden. Reagan fought a proxy war with the Soviet Union by training, arming, equipping, and funding Islamist mujahidin fighters in Afghanistan. Reagan funneled billions of dollars, along with top-secret intelligence and sophisticated weaponry to these fighters through the Pakistani intelligence service. The Taliban and Osama Bin Laden — a prominent mujaheddin commander — emerged from these mujaheddin groups Reagan helped create, and U.S. policy towards Pakistan remains strained because of the intelligence services' close relations to these fighters. In fact, Reagan's decision to continue the proxy war after the Soviets were willing to retreat played a direct role in Bin Laden's ascendancy.
Conservatives seem to be in such denial about the less flattering aspects of Reagan; it sometimes appears as if they genuinely don't know the truth of his legacy. Yesterday, when liberal activist Mike Stark challenged hate radio host Rush Limbaugh on why Reagan remains a conservative hero despite raising taxes so many times, Limbaugh flew into a tirade and demanded, "Where did you get this silly notion that Reagan raised taxes?"


Read original post here and this is another great article by: By Alex Seitz-Wald at Think Progress!  http://thinkprogress.org/2011/02/05/reagan-centennial/

Update- Salon has more in their series "The Real Reagan," including how he cared more about UFOs than AIDS and how Reagan destroyed respect for the social compact that rebuilt America after World War II.  http://www.salon.com/news/the_real_reagan/index.html


"Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral." -Paolo Friere-

Friday, November 19, 2010

Sarah Palin, and the nefarious relationship between- Paideia Research LLC, SarahPAC, Corp95 and Anonymous Owners!

Posted on by beardog321
The infamous "Paideia Research LLC" of Sheridan, WY

OK, we have discussed the Paideia Research LLC at 1617 N. Main St. in Sheridan, Wyoming and it was the wrong address. Also how Corp95 was the registered agent, (And the BBB also has the Sheridan address as Corp95′s.) which is run by David Deloach, who in his own words said he creates 2000 shelf companies a year. This appears to be the dark side and under-belly of Wyoming’s liberal lax business establishment laws, or lack thereof.

I learned about the address in Dana Point, the location he uses on his shelf companies, that being: 32565 B Golden Lantern St., Suite 140, Dana Point, CA 92629, is a mail drop, and David Deloach’s phone number: (949) 487-2436 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              (949) 487-2436      


end_of_the_skype_highlighting

This location is a mail-center, called-
AIM Mail Center 19
32565 B Golden Lantern
Dana Point, CA 92629
Phone: (949) 443-1192 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              (949) 443-1192      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
FAX: (949) 443-0375
Email: aim19@aimmailcenters.com
Owner: Mike and Stephanie Lee-

I am guessing now, but I would bet the ranch that Suite 140 is actually his mailbox there at the mail center. Just a guess, as I haven’t called Mike and/or Stephanie Lee yet. I’ll leave that to you.
His other face as an Orange County Association of Realtors member: David L DeLoach, REALTOR® David DeLoach Real-Estate, 33176 Trinidad Dr., Dana Point, CA 92629, Telephone 949-487-2436 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              949-487-2436      end_of_the_skype_highlighting and Fax 949-218-4176, and e-mail @ Service@Corp95.com .

This is the location of the Office for Mr. David Deloach, courtesy of some real estate outfit.

This appears to be a private residence in a development neighborhood, so I’m guessing he is working out of his home. He does live in Orange County, which is a strong Republican stronghold in California, probably the strongest by all measures. It would be interesting to find out is he holds a place in republican party politics in Orange County, and in California, particularly with the recent events with Palin at California State University Stanislaus.

So, His Corp95 address is a Mail Box franchise store mailbox, and his real estate is run out of his house. The distance between his Mail-Box Store address and his Real Estate Office/Home is about a mile. Why is someone who lives in Dana Point so interested in setting up all these shelf companies in Wyoming for? Money is my guess, but why the secrecy? And for whom? And what is his political connection to Palin? And why did he seem to get a little annoyed during my phone call? Was I hitting a nerve? Has he ever been to Sheridan WY, or Casper, and does he do everything by priority mail, and money orders. His 210 Nichols Avenue in Casper, WY is Casper Answering Service. Has Wyoming become the Cayman Islands of the Continental United States. Their laws are lax, and accountability is non-existent. Even Canadians are coming here to incorporate! And now political money laundered or whatever the secret nefarious activities that are actually going on here.
I went to Sheridan Answering Services, and etc, this afternoon (11-16-10) after I went to my VA doctors appointment. My appointment was at 1pm, and I got out of there about 1:35pm. The weather is turning for the worse around here as winter is rearing its ugly head. I got to 1617 N. Main St. Suite B, around 1:45pm, and took out an older digital camera that records just audio if I want, and set it up. The wind was blowing at 40-50mph gusts, and the snow was flying, and I was wearing shorts. Hey, if it isn’t below 0° yet, shorts are the norm for me. I explain it some day, but not now.
I set my old camera up to record and placed it in my coat pocket. It would have been able to pick up the conversation, as I had tested it, but I forgot one thing, to turn it on. I thought I pressed the button, but I obviously didn’t. but that’s OK, I have a good memory.
I entered, and the door was open this day. I’m thinking maybe she was in the bathroom yesterday, as it looks like she lives there, although she said she didn’t when I asked her. When I got there, I obeyed the not to let the cat escape sign, and there was kitty waiting for me at a desk right as I walked in. It looked more like I was walking into someones living room rather than an office. Now, my new source asked me not to use her name, and I will respect that, as I told her I was writing a blog about some stuff. The most you just got was that she is a she, or is she? Anyhow, I will respect her request as that is how sources work sometimes, and I am not going to pull a Judith Miller. I will call her Jane, just to make it easy on you all, and me too.
Jane told me a twisted story of corporate malfeasance, and many irregularities. I spoke with her for over an hour, and she was really nice. She is not, or never was the mailing address for, or the registered agent for Paideia Research LLC, ever. She has been located at this address for the last 15 years. (She said I reminded her of a guy that use to be a manager across the street where the old’ KFC use to be, and I told her I was, back in the 2000-02. She told me the place went to hell in a hand-basket after me and Chris left.) There was a time in her past that she acted as a registered agent for Corp95, and David Deloach and had a business association with him. She called all the companies he set up subsidiaries, but they are actually shelf companies, as opposed to shell corporation, 2 different animals. But Jane told me she got out of the business when her name and address were used without her knowledge by someone setting up these shelf companies, and she was fined $2000 by the state. She also told me there is and has been an ongoing 2 year investigation into these nefarious outfits and their Laissez-Faire attitude toward even Wyoming’s minimalist incorporation laws. She also told me that another outfit out here called “Corporations registration Services” and/or “Business Registration Services” that are on the sleazy side, and flaunt the law, as there isn’t much of one here, so whatever it was that Jane got fined $2000 must have been serious. She told me that now when she gets mail for these shelf corporations/LLCs and she knows the registered agent, she just forwards the mail to them, otherwise she said she just returns it to the sender. She also said she was unfamiliar with the name Paideia Research LLC, as that company had not been setup yet as a shelf company when she was still working for David Deloach/Corp95.
Jane talked about how the onslaught of numerous nefarious and out of control outfits establishing scores and scores of these shelf companies, and how many have just used various Wyoming addresses that weren’t theirs, and just arbitrary, to use to set up their companies. She said it’s like the wild-west of shelf company establishing, where the Marshall/Sheriff alone can’t handle all the out of control set-up companies.

UPDATED- And Cleaned of Sheridan 1617 N. Main Suite B Answering Service owner’s name.

 


So, what I learned that the under-belly of Wyoming lax business incorporation laws has created a lot of unsavory characters and organizations, and more bad is going on that the general public is unaware of. She also told me to call David Deloach, as he would have some answers (Maybe to his secret business connections yes, but to an investigative blogger, I think not, but I tried.) and the call Kaylee and Karen at the Wyoming Secretary of State’s office, investigative division. Now, I had much better luck with them, well better conversations at least, and they were very receptive, and I even sent them the large 400+ page FEC 3rd Quarter Filing for SarahPAC, along with copies of the 2 deficiency letters. I spoke with Kaylee both yesterday, and she called backed this afternoon. You too can call, just call the Secretary of States office and ask for Kaylee. She hasn’t really given me any information I didn’t already know, but I did give her information that they did not know, and that was fraudulent. I feel like a “dirty rat”, James Cagney style “You dirty rat…”

Wyoming likes their secret ownership of companies, as do the companies that set up these companies.

This is from Wyoming Corporate Services Inc.-

A nominee is used when you want to increase your privacy, decrease your visibility, or have someone do something that you can not do.  We can provide a nominee for the following situations:
 
3.  Full-Time Nominee Service. This service is designed for those that absolutely do not want their name to be associated with a company.  The nominee is not only the officer of record, but is the only one who signs documents for the company.  The nominee will sign all corporate documents, except those that are not lawful or that bring personal liability to the nominee.  There is a yearly charge for the nominee service.  You also must sign a nominee agreement, which protects the nominee if there is wrong doing. Tax returns are not signed for by the nominee.

And now for the registered agent definition from the same Company-

Registered Agent Services-

Wyoming laws require that all corporations maintain a registered agent within Wyoming’s borders, with a live person there available for service, Monday through Friday 9:00 am to 5:00 pm. The duty of the registered agent is to accept service of legal documents and notifications from the state or other entities. As your registered agent, we will accept all legal documents on behalf of your corporation and forward them to you. This is not a regular mail forwarding service.


Also included in this service is the forwarding of all mail to you from the State government and any due process. Most other companies do not provide this service.

(Registered agent service is automatically included in the basic Corporation and LLC packages for the first year.)
$135.00 per year for each year thereafter, if paid via Auto-Debit/credit card. $185.00, if billed.
I wrote to Kaylee at the Wyoming Secretary of State a little while ago about the registered agent requirement of state residence, as David Deloach was quite insistent that as a registered agent he was responsible for collecting incoming lawsuits. Somebody with connections in California please check out and see if there are any Republican Party/David Deloach connections. Here is the 2nd letter I wrote to Kaylee-
 
Ms. Nelson,
 
Rather then trying to scour the Wyoming Statues, (Maybe you can tell me the locations of business laws?) would you all know if a registered agent has to live physically in the State of Wyoming, or, like Corp95 having an address in Wyoming, but it’s principal/registered agent along with being the registered agent of all these 2000 companies he said he creates each year in Wyoming (He told me he was, as he was trying to act condescending with me in testing my knowledge of what a registered agent does & He told me they accept all the lawsuits filed against the secretly owned LLC. Why are these LLC’s getting sued?) lives in Dana Point California at 33176 Trinidad Dr., Dana Point, CA 92629, Telephone 949-487-2436 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              949-487-2436      end_of_the_skype_highlighting and Fax 949-218-4176, and e-mail- Service@Corp95.com .
Have we entered the new age since the Citizen’s United Supreme Court decision where corporations are now people, and as a Corp95 has an address here in Casper, then therefore it is treated like a living breathing human? It just keeps getting stranger and stranger.
Thanks for your time, and sorry to bother you. Have a great day!
 
Best wishes always,
Bill Harasym 
“Washing one’s hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless
means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral.” -Paolo Friere-

And the first letter I wrote earlier today-
 
Howdy Ms. Kaylee Nelson,
 
First, thank you for your time in this matter. Now, it was listed in the report for the third quarter, 2010 (Page 462 lists Paideia Research LLC of 1617 N. Main St., Sheridan, Wyoming.) that Tim Crawford, the treasurer for SarahPAC had filed. Here is the link too: http://herndon1.sdrdc.com/pdf/957/10931412957/10931412957.pdf#navpanes=0
Also are copies of both letters of deficiencies sent to SarahPAC by the FEC. Also, look at your own 3rd Quarter Business Charters for the Sec. of State. If you do a search for 1617 N. Main St. Sheridan, there are 6 new businesses using that false address. *&%$@ at Sheridan Answering Services told me she is out of the registered agent business because she got screwed, and a $2000 fine. Corp95 now uses 210 Nichols Rd in Casper, which is Casper Answering Services. David Deloach has a thing for answering services in his shady operations. Something isn’t kosher here, in my honest opinion.
Thanks for all your help, and good luck. Anything else you need, let me know. You all should do a sting on these guys, as having the Cayman’s Island reputation is not a good one. It is only followed by other bad behavior.
 
Best wishes always,
Bill Harasym
  

“Washing one’s hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless
means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral.” -Paolo Friere-

 
That’s it for now, as I haven’t transcribed my 2 conversations with Kaylee yet, but they are fairly mundane. If anyone seriously wants to hear them, let me know, thank you. I know you have moved on from this side story, but I am still following it up. I know about the Palin’s book issue, as I refuse to call it a novel or anything else that might attribute to it some sense of a true literary work. Maybe a door-stop, or something for shooting at the target range, but as pure literary genius, or even dumber and dumber it is not.

Monday, August 9, 2010

Top 5 Social Security Myths!


USA Beanie Bear in his favorite mug! This is truly his "Mugshot"!
Top 5 Social Security Myths!


Rumors of Social Security's demise are greatly exaggerated. But some powerful people keep spreading lies about the program to scare people into accepting benefit cuts. Can you check out this list of Social Security myths and share it with your friends, family and coworkers?
 
Myth 1: Social Security is going broke.

Reality: There is no Social Security crisis. By 2023, Social Security will have a $4.3 trillion surplus (yes, trillion with a 'T'). It can pay out all scheduled benefits for the next quarter-century with no changes whatsoever.[1] After 2037, it'll still be able to pay out 75% of scheduled benefits--and again, that's without any changes. The program started preparing for the Baby Boomers retirement decades ago.[2] Anyone who insists Social Security is broke probably wants to break it themselves.

Myth 2: We have to raise the retirement age because people are living longer.

Reality: This is a red-herring to trick you into agreeing to benefit cuts. Retirees are living about the same amount of time as they were in the 1930s. The reason average life expectancy is higher is mostly because many fewer people die as children than did 70 years ago.[3] What's more, what gains there have been are distributed very unevenly--since 1972, life expectancy increased by 6.5 years for workers in the top half of the income brackets, but by less than 2 years for those in the bottom half.[4] But those intent on cutting Social Security love this argument because raising the retirement age is the same as an across-the-board benefit cut.

Myth 3: Benefit cuts are the only way to fix Social Security.
Reality: Social Security doesn't need to be fixed. But if we want to strengthen it, here's a better way: Make the rich pay their fair share. If the very rich paid taxes on all of their income, Social Security would be sustainable for decades to come.[5] Right now, high earners only pay Social Security taxes on the first $106,000 of their income.[6] But conservatives insist benefit cuts are the only way because they want to protect the super-rich from paying their fair share.

Myth 4: The Social Security Trust Fund has been raided and is full of IOUs.

Reality: Not even close to true. The Social Security Trust Fund isn't full of IOUs, it's full of U.S. Treasury Bonds. And those bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.[7] The reason Social Security holds only treasury bonds is the same reason many Americans do: The federal government has never missed a single interest payment on its debts. President Bush wanted to put Social Security funds in the stock market--which would have been disastrous--but luckily, he failed. So the trillions of dollars in the Social Security Trust Fund, which are separate from the regular budget, are as safe as can be.

Myth 5: Social Security adds to the deficit.

Reality: It's not just wrong -- it's impossible! By law, Social Security funds are separate from the budget, and it must pay its own way. That means that Social Security can't add one penny to the deficit.[8]

Closing remarks-
 So, be scared, be very scared, and not of the facts, but by those who continue their constant fearmongering that they seem to embrace on just about every issue out there. 

Why do they constantly do that you ask? Because many people, who are un and under-educated, and possibly too lazy to do their own research on the subject in question buy into the lies, myths, misinformation and the fearmongering. 

One of the major problems with our country is that the American electorate does not do their homework, and instead they buy into the 30 second sound-bites, pundit talking points and outright lies, and the cable news networks. Now you can pick your poison on which side you favor, or if you are in the majority and are "independent", but if you come out of your formal and/or informal education and formative years and you haven't learned to think "your" own thoughts and speak your own mind, well you just haven't learned anything of prime importance. Oh, you may be able to repeat the square roots of every number, or speak 5 different languages, but if you can't form an opinion on the way the world is going, and have the ability to stand on that opinion, and I don't mean by regurgitating your political leaning's talking/bullet points, you really haven't learned a damn thing.

Sources:

1."To Deficit Hawks: We the People Know Best on Social Security" New Deal 2.0, June 14, 2010
http://www.newdeal20.org/2010/06/14/to-defict-hawks-we-the-people-know-best-on-social-security-12290/

2. "The Straight Facts on Social Security" Economic Opportunity Institute, September 2009
http://www.eoionline.org/retirement_security/fact_sheets/StraightFactsSocialSecurity-Sep09.pdf

3. "Social Security and the Age of Retirement"Center for Economic and Policy Research, June 2010
http://www.cepr.net/index.php/publications/reports/social-security-and-the-age-of-retirement/

4. "More on raising the retirement age" Ezra Klein, Washington Post, July 8, 2010
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/07/more_on_raising_the_retirement.html

5. "Social Security is sustainable" Economic and Policy Institute, May 27, 2010
http://www.epi.org/analysis_and_opinion/entry/social_security_is_sustainable/

6. "Maximum wage contribution and the amount for a credit in 2010." Social Security Administration, April 23, 2010
http://ssa-custhelp.ssa.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/240

7. "Trust Fund FAQs" Social Security Administration, February 18, 2010
http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/ProgData/fundFAQ.html

8. "To Deficit Hawks: We the People Know Best on Social Security" New Deal 2.0, June 14, 2010
http://www.newdeal20.org/2010/06/14/to-defict-hawks-we-the-people-know-best-on-social-security-12290/

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Save the Wolves! From the Media?



"WOLVES AT LARGE: - CASPER AREA" That was the Lead story on April 22, 2009 during the 5pm, 6pm, and 10pm news @ K2TV, Casper, Wyoming-



From KTWO on April 22, 2009 (Earth Day)-

WOLVES AT LARGE: - CASPER AREA

AFTER TWO WOLVES KILLED A YOUNG CALF ON PRIVATE PROPERTY LAST WEEK IN THE LARAMIE REGION, THE DEBATE OF WOLVES IN WYOMING HEATS UP AND HITS CLOSER TO HOME. THIS IS THE FIRST TIME WOLVES HAVE EVER BEEN SPOTTED KILLING LIVESTOCK IN CENTRAL WYOMING. US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE RESPONDED TO THE SCENE OF THE DEAD COW TO INVESTIGATE, AND DETERMINED THE CALF WAS INDEED HUNTED AND KILLED BY TWO WOLVES. THE RANCHER, WHO'S NAME HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED, DID NOT ACTUALLY SEE THE WOLVES...BUT OTHER RANCHERS HAVE SPOTTED WOLVES IN THIS AREA SOUTHWEST OF CASPER. A SPOKESPERSON WITH THE FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE SAYS RANCHERS NEED TO USE CAUTION IF THEY SEE A WOLF ON THEIR PROPERTY. IF YOU SPOT A WOLF ANYWHERE NEAR YOUR PROPERTY, CALL THE U-S FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE AT 261-6365.

First of all, in Wyoming, wolves are a big, no make that a huge and passionate issue, because they live here, and some of us have plans for them to stay for a very long time. The facts are unimportant in this story, just emotions, and hearsay. As the rancher said, "I got friends that live up in the Jackson area, in that area, and they've seen what it's done to the elk, and the population up there, and we don't want to see that." Not mentioned were the non-lethal ways of predator control, or the fact that domestic dogs kill more cattle then wolves. Nor were the specifics this rancher was talking about, just inflaming generalizations. I did e-mail this reporter, Briana Bermensolo with facts related to wolves, both the pro and the con. But no, they have to hop on the fearmongering bandwagon, and produce a bias, and partial story. This is what they call journalism these days. How sad, both for the students who don't learn how to be impartial, but also include there own, or playing to their audience's bias! Facts no longer matter. And Briana says at the end, "If you see wolves on your property, call the Fish and Wildlife Service." WHY? Are they escaped prisoners from Gitmo, or the state prison in Rawlins? Why not get your camera, and take a picture of these beautiful animals?



Wyoming's Wolf Recovery Plan:

Wyoming Plan Summary-

Wyoming’s wolf management plan is a significant departure for wildlife management in the state because it was created by elected officials in the legislature rather than wildlife biologists at the state’s Game and Fish Department. The current plan divides Wyoming into two different zones. In 88 percent of the state, known as the "predator zone," wolves are considered varmints and can be killed by anyone, at any time, by nearly any means. In the remaining 12 percent of the state—the northwestern corner—wolves are considered to be trophy game animals and are subject to management by the Wyoming Game and Fish Department.

In addition, the state law grants private citizens broad latitude to kill wolves in "defense of private property," which could jeopardize wolf population numbers. What Could Be Improved The Wyoming plan is based on politics, not science, and needs to be reworked by the state’s game officials. We would like to see Wyoming adopt a similar approach to Montana’s—managing wolves like other native game species, rather than varmints to be shot on site.

Federal courts agree. A recent judicial ruling reinstating endangered species status criticized these elements of Wyoming’s plan. The federal government has since retracted its delisting rule and Wyoming is starting over with a new plan.

-From the Western Wolf Coalition- @

http://www.westernwolves.org/index.php/read-the-plans-wyoming

One of the greatest threats to wolves are human's fears and misunderstandings about the species. There are many fairy tales and myths that tend to misrepresent wolves as villainous, dangerous creatures. Wolves are responsible for less than 1% of ALL livestock kills, but that doesn't stop the media, i.e.- K2TV (KTWO) out of Casper, Wyoming from airing a story about wolves, and the great "wolf scare" going on here in support of Wyoming ranchers, conservative politics, hunters, outfitters, uninformed reporters, etc.

Wolves and all wildlife need to be protected, and all this misinformation and myths need to be addressed. And the media needs to be a little more impartial, specifically here in Wyoming, because playing to one audience does not make for sound and good journalism!

Ms. Stone from Defenders of Wildlife said, ""Today for example there are probably hundreds of sheep and cattle that have died from dogs, coyotes and a number of other species, but only the wolves are going to make the news,"

And from "My Yellowstone Wolves Blog"- "As the WY story states that wolves (not seen but assumed) killed on "private" property, perhaps we homeowners should begin reporting when their cattle wander onto our private property and do damage. Is there reciprocity? If they can shoot wolves, can we shoot their cattle? They (their wandering cows) are, after all, damaging our property and causing us a bunch of money." - susangeez

For more info, check out this link: http://www.defenders.org/wildlife_and_habitat/wildlife/wolf,_gray.php

Also From Defenders of Wildlife-

Wolf Predation Plays Small Role in Livestock Losses in 2005-

1. In the continental U.S., health issues such as respiratory problems, digestive problems, calving complications and disease were overwhelmingly the most significant causes of cattle death in 2005.

2. Only 0.11% of all cattle losses were due to wolf predation in 2005.

3. Coyotes killed more than 22 times more cattle than wolves killed that year.

4. Domestic dogs killed almost 5 times as many cattle, and vultures killed almost twice as many cattle as wolves did in 2005.

5. Theft was responsible for almost 5 times as many cattle losses as were lost by wolf predation.

6. Predation by coyotes was the largest cause of sheep loss in 2005, accounting for 23% of all losses, followed by health problems & weather-related issues.

7. In states with wolf populations, an average of less than 2.5% of sheep loss was due to predation by wolves in 2005.

We all need to work this out, as it is not totally a black and white issue, rather it has tons of gray area, and it all needs to be addressed. And it is not only for the wolves sake, but in the end, for the sake of humanity!



LEAP